The decision deepens an impasse over the court between the government and the opposition-aligned president.
The decision deepens an impasse over the court between the government and the opposition-aligned president.
The decision was welcomed Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who said it must immediately be enforced.
We are an independent, nonprofit media outlet, funded through the support of our readers.
If you appreciate the work we do, please consider helping us to continue and expand it.
While Nawrocki accepted two new judges chosen by parliament, he refused to receive the oaths of four others.
The president could refuse to swear in the new judges, deepening Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
The move is an attempt by the government to bypass the president’s veto on reform of the National Council of the Judiciary.
President Nawrocki must now choose one of the five candidates to be the new chief justice.
The government condemned his “autocratic” plans.
Karol Nawrocki argued that the measures would simply create even greater “legal chaos”.
The speaker of parliament made the decision despite the current authorities regarding the body as illegitimate in its current form.
It found that the current and former justice ministers acted “without a proper legal basis”.
The case has highlighted how Poland’s rule-of-law dispute can impact citizens’ everyday lives.
The CJEU also found that the tribunal is not a valid court as it contains unlawfully appointed judges.
The resolution, adopted by two Supreme Court chambers, deepens Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
The government wants to depoliticise the National Council of the Judiciary, which is responsible for nominating judges.