The resolution, adopted by two Supreme Court chambers, deepens Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
The resolution, adopted by two Supreme Court chambers, deepens Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
The government wants to depoliticise the National Council of the Judiciary, which is responsible for nominating judges.
We are an independent, nonprofit media outlet, funded through the support of our readers.
If you appreciate the work we do, please consider helping us to continue and expand it.
The government’s spokesman condemned the decision as a “usurpation of power and attempt to undermine the justice system”.
The government wants to ensure that the body responsible for nominating judges is independent of politicians.
The plans will help ensure “stability and legal security for citizens”, says the justice ministry.
The disputed chamber is responsible, among other things, for validating election results.
Distrust in the courts is now much higher than when the government took office promising to restore the rule of law.
Poland’s rule-of-law crisis has taken a further twist.
The ruling has been welcomed as “extremely important” by Poland’s justice minister.
The Supreme Administrative Court ruled that Tusk had the right to revoke a countersignature he said was made by mistake.
The legislation aimed to reverse the politicisation of the court by the former Law and Justice (PiS) administration.
Andrzej Duda cited a man who had told him a return to hanging traitors would discourage such actions, saying “there is truth in these words”.
The government sees the TK as illegitimate as it contains judges unlawfully appointed by the former administration.
“Obama, Soros, and the Globalist Left are trying to rig Poland’s presidential election,” write the members of Congress.