The president could refuse to swear in the new judges, deepening Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
The president could refuse to swear in the new judges, deepening Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
The move is an attempt by the government to bypass the president’s veto on reform of the National Council of the Judiciary.
We are an independent, nonprofit media outlet, funded through the support of our readers.
If you appreciate the work we do, please consider helping us to continue and expand it.
President Nawrocki must now choose one of the five candidates to be the new chief justice.
The government condemned his “autocratic” plans.
Karol Nawrocki argued that the measures would simply create even greater “legal chaos”.
The speaker of parliament made the decision despite the current authorities regarding the body as illegitimate in its current form.
It found that the current and former justice ministers acted “without a proper legal basis”.
The case has highlighted how Poland’s rule-of-law dispute can impact citizens’ everyday lives.
The CJEU also found that the tribunal is not a valid court as it contains unlawfully appointed judges.
The resolution, adopted by two Supreme Court chambers, deepens Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
The government wants to depoliticise the National Council of the Judiciary, which is responsible for nominating judges.
The government’s spokesman condemned the decision as a “usurpation of power and attempt to undermine the justice system”.
The government wants to ensure that the body responsible for nominating judges is independent of politicians.
The plans will help ensure “stability and legal security for citizens”, says the justice ministry.