The commission says states can introduce measures that “may seriously interfere with fundamental rights”.
![Poland gets €52m from EU to protect border from “weaponisation of migrants” by Russia and Belarus](https://notesfrompoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/P064969-324445_50-1080x675.jpg)
The commission says states can introduce measures that “may seriously interfere with fundamental rights”.
It found that the PKW did not properly substantiate its claims of irregularities in campaign spending by PiS.
We are an independent, nonprofit media outlet, funded through the support of our readers.
If you appreciate the work we do, please consider helping us to continue and expand it.
Talks focused on security, and in particular on the need to provide continued support to Ukraine.
Stanisława Leszczyńska sought to ensure that mothers and babies were properly cared for amid the brutal conditions in the camp.
Poland's government has announced that it will end the 0% VAT rate on food that was introduced two years ago to help soften the blow of soaring inflation. The finance ministry argues that the recent slowing of price rises renders the measure no longer necessary....
In recent weeks, the zloty has also been rising strongly against other major currencies, including the US dollar, Swiss franc and British pound.
Application deadline: 2 April 2024.
Journey times will be reduce by as much as two thirds.
A leading Catholic commentator has criticised the church for allowing the bishop to go into retirement rather than facing real punishment.
The move is part of a more humanitarian approach to the migration crisis promised by the new government.
His party, which is part of the ruling coalition, is investigating the claims.
The move is part of a wider NATO decision to suspend operation of the treaty in response to Russia’s decision to withdraw from it last year.
The resolution also calls on the EU to protect markets from “excessive” Ukrainian imports and withdraw “unreasonable and costly” climate policies.
TVN has condemned the decision, calling it an attempt at “censorship and intimidation”.