The current government plans to appeal against the ruling, for which it blames the former administration.

The current government plans to appeal against the ruling, for which it blames the former administration.
The decision was made by a new judicial chamber established as part of its efforts to unlock frozen EU funds.
We are an independent, nonprofit media outlet, funded through the support of our readers.
If you appreciate the work we do, please consider helping us to continue and expand it.
The legislation “fulfils the key milestones indicated by the European Commission” for Poland to unlock its frozen funds, says the government.
The Polish government argues that it has complied with the requirement to close its disciplinary chamber for judges.
The opposition warns that the chamber will simply be replaced by another that serves a similar purpose.
The European Commission president specified the three objectives that Poland must meet for its post-pandemic recovery funds to be disbursed.
It is the first time the EU has ever withdrawn funds from a member state for failing to comply with an ECJ ruling.
However, at the same time he proposed creating a new “Chamber of Professional Responsibility” tasked with holding judges to account.
The money will be taken from Poland’s European funds if Warsaw continues to refuse to pay the fines.
The court said two judges were denied their right to a fair hearing after being rejected for a job.
A Polish minister accused the CJEU of “abusing” its powers to undermine Polish sovereignty.
Poland’s government has responded to yesterday’s action by the European Commission.
Poland said that no new cases were being accepted by the disciplinary body.
It violates the right to a fair trial, says the ECHR.