Poland’s new government wants to review the location chosen by its predecessor for the country’s first nuclear power plant. Experts warn that this risks causing major delays in – or even killing off – the project, which is a central part of efforts to reduce emissions by moving away from coal-fired power.

In October, Choczewo on the Baltic coast was confirmed as the chosen site for the plant, which will be developed with US partners.

But last week, Donald Tusk, head of the new government that took office in December, announced that a “quick audit” was already underway to see if “the location is optimal”.

That was followed yesterday by a statement on the issue from Beata Rutkiewicz, the government-appointed governor of the Pomerania province in which Choczewo is located.

Rutkiewicz’s office wrote that “in view of the large number of comments and discussions she has had, it is reasonable to revisit and analyse the environmental decision issued for the location of the power plant”.

However, they also denied “false information appearing in the public space…that a decision has [already] been made to change the location of the nuclear power plant in Pomerania”.

“Final decisions regarding the location of the plant will be made by the government of Poland in due course, after detailed analyses,” concluded the statement.

This morning, Tusk’s chief of staff, Jan Grabiec, underlined that the government has not yet decided to change the location and that there are currently “no grounds” to do so.

“The power plant is one of the priority issues for the government,” he added. “We will analyse what has been done so far and develop this project. We are yet to enter into direct dialogue with partners, but it will happen…In all investment processes, certain changes may occur.”

Meanwhile, another senior local official, Leszek Bonna, the deputy marshal of the Pomerania province, yesterday expressed concern that the location chosen for the nuclear plant is in “the most valuable tourist area in the Pomeranian region”.

“There are wide sandy beaches and woodlands there. Part of this heritage will be excluded from use by tourists and residents due to the impact of this development,” said Bonna, who suggested the location should be reconsidered.

In a further statement today, Bonna confirmed that the regional authorities had informed the national environmental protection agency, GDOŚ, “about doubts regarding the impact of the selected location”.

The comments by various officials suggesting a reevaluation of the decision on where to locate the nuclear plant sparked concern from energy experts.

“Changing the location – even to a nearby one – is a waste of several years and millions of zloty,” said Jakub Wiech, editor-in-chief of industry news service Energetyka24. “We already know that there will be no nuclear power plant in 2033 [as originally planned]. We are fighting for 2035, and any further postponement is a disaster.”

“Changing the location for the construction of a nuclear power plant at this point would de facto mean the death of the project, with very dangerous energy and geopolitical consequences,” wrote energy analyst Robert Tomaszewski of the Polityka Insight think tank.

Meanwhile, the company responsible for the construction of the plant, Polskie Elektrownie Jądrowe (PEJ), in response to information about the planned reconsideration of the site decision, stressed yesterday that Choczewo “meets all the environmental requirements for this type of facility”.

“The reasons for choosing this location include access to cooling water, low population density, lack of buildings and the possibility of transporting bulky cargo by sea,” it wrote in the press release.

Poland currently generates most of its electricity – around two thirds of it – from coal. Under an energy strategy adopted by the previous government last year, the country would instead generate most of its power from renewables and nuclear.

In addition to the planned nuclear power plant in Pomerania, another is due to be built in central Poland in cooperation with South Korea. Various state-owned and private Polish firms are also hoping to establish a number of so-called nuclear small modular reactors (SMRs).

However, part of the SMR plans were recently also cast into doubt following a negative assessment by a state security agency.


Notes from Poland is run by a small editorial team and published by an independent, non-profit foundation that is funded through donations from our readers. We cannot do what we do without your support.

Main image credit: PEJ (press materials) 

Pin It on Pinterest

Support us!