Poland’s rule-of-law crisis has taken a further twist.
Poland’s rule-of-law crisis has taken a further twist.
The ruling has been welcomed as “extremely important” by Poland’s justice minister.
We are an independent, nonprofit media outlet, funded through the support of our readers.
If you appreciate the work we do, please consider helping us to continue and expand it.
Over half think that courts function worse than they did before the current government came to power.
The decision was made by a new judicial chamber established as part of its efforts to unlock frozen EU funds.
The trio accuse Piotr Schab – a key figure in the government’s overhaul of the judiciary – of abusing his powers.
The judges argue that the chief justice’s term expired last month, but she denies this and has been supported by the government.
Małgorzata Gersdorf, who led the Supreme Court from 2014 to 2020, has been a prominent critic of the government’s overhaul of the judiciary.
The three judges refused to sit alongside colleagues appointed after the government overhauled the judicial nomination body.
The Constitutional Tribunal contains improperly appointed judges who “infected it with unlawfulness”, finds the Supreme Administrative Court.
The opposition accuses the ruling party of wanting to delay the local elections for its own political benefit.
While Poland is willing to show “some flexibility” in negotiations, it “will not back down” from certain “lines that cannot be crossed”.
“If they do not bring back this money in the coming days, they will answer for it in the manner provided for by the law,” says the opposition leader.
“The liberal-left camp that makes up the majority in the European Commission wants to change the government in Poland at all costs,” says Andrzej Duda.
The Polish government argues that it has complied with the requirement to close its disciplinary chamber for judges.