Krzysztof Mularczyk
In many areas – such as social, economic, defence and migration policy – it differs very little in style and substance.
![Poland’s Tusk government is not so different from its PiS predecessor [Opinion]](https://notesfrompoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/53393979442_a57350ace2_k-1080x675.jpg)
Krzysztof Mularczyk
In many areas – such as social, economic, defence and migration policy – it differs very little in style and substance.
The decision has exposed the government’s “thuggish methods”, says the politician.
We are an independent, nonprofit media outlet, funded through the support of our readers.
If you appreciate the work we do, please consider helping us to continue and expand it.
Małgorzata Gersdorf, who led the Supreme Court from 2014 to 2020, has been a prominent critic of the government’s overhaul of the judiciary.
The three judges refused to sit alongside colleagues appointed after the government overhauled the judicial nomination body.
The Constitutional Tribunal contains improperly appointed judges who “infected it with unlawfulness”, finds the Supreme Administrative Court.
The opposition accuses the ruling party of wanting to delay the local elections for its own political benefit.
While Poland is willing to show “some flexibility” in negotiations, it “will not back down” from certain “lines that cannot be crossed”.
“If they do not bring back this money in the coming days, they will answer for it in the manner provided for by the law,” says the opposition leader.
“The liberal-left camp that makes up the majority in the European Commission wants to change the government in Poland at all costs,” says Andrzej Duda.
The Polish government argues that it has complied with the requirement to close its disciplinary chamber for judges.
Opposition leader Donald Tusk is a “collaborator” in his “genes”, says the justice minister.
There are “fundamental legal obstacles preventing our participation in cases involving persons appointed…in a defective procedure”.
“As a result of the non-fulfilment of basic conditions, the commission cannot reimburse any expenditure submitted by Poland,” says a spokesman.
The Polish government has rejected the ruling, arguing that the European Court of Human Rights “has no competence to rule on whether a court is a court or not”.