Maciej Berek was chosen despite a rebellion from some members of the ruling coalition.
Maciej Berek was chosen despite a rebellion from some members of the ruling coalition.
They warn that Maciej Berek’s political ties could undermine efforts to restore public trust in the court.
We are an independent, nonprofit media outlet, funded through the support of our readers.
If you appreciate the work we do, please consider helping us to continue and expand it.
The move has generated controversy given the government’s pledge to “depoliticise” the court.
Sławomir Patyra says taking part in court proceedings would violate his constitutional oath.
The government says it will ignore the ruling and foreign marriage certificates will continue to be transcribed.
President Nawrocki, however, continues to refuse to swear in four other judges chosen by parliament.
The decision deepens an impasse over the court between the government and the opposition-aligned president.
The decision was welcomed Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who said it must immediately be enforced.
A senior presidential aide has called the accusations “ridiculous”.
The chief justice’s decision, which was widely expected, deepens an unprecedented crisis around the court.
The development marks a further twist in Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
While Nawrocki accepted two new judges chosen by parliament, he refused to receive the oaths of four others.
The president could refuse to swear in the new judges, deepening Poland’s rule-of-law crisis.
As well as signing it, he also sent the budget to the Constitutional Tribunal for assessment.